Source: OJ L, 2024/1689, 12.7.2024Current language: EN
- Artificial intelligence act
Basic legislative acts
- AI act regulation
Article 103 Amendment to Regulation (EU) No 167/2013
Summary What does Article 103 of the AI act regulation say?
This is a short amending article that integrates the AI Act's requirements into an existing piece of EU legislation — specifically Regulation (EU) No 167/2013, which governs the approval of agricultural and forestry vehicles.
It inserts a new requirement into that regulation so that when the Commission adopts delegated acts concerning AI systems that qualify as safety components, it must take into account the high-risk AI system requirements found in Chapter III, Section 2 of the AI Act.
This article is one of several in the AI Act that amend sectoral legislation to ensure alignment with the new AI framework.
Important points:
- The Commission is required to take into account the AI Act's Chapter III, Section 2 requirements when adopting delegated acts under Regulation (EU) No 167/2013 that concern AI systems qualifying as safety components.
- This obligation is triggered specifically when the AI system in question is a safety component within the meaning of the AI Act.
- This article amends existing agricultural and forestry vehicle legislation to bridge it with the AI Act's harmonised rules.
Springlex's summary of the article, a reading aid, not a substitute for the legal text.
In Article 17(5) of Regulation (EU) No 167/2013, the following subparagraph is added:
‘When adopting delegated acts pursuant to the first subparagraph concerning artificial intelligence systems which are safety components within the meaning of Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 of the European Parliament and of the Council(59), the requirements set out in Chapter III, Section 2, of that Regulation shall be taken into account.
Relevant recitals
Recital 49 Amendments to other acts
As regards high-risk AI systems that are safety components of products or systems, or which are themselves products or systems falling within the scope of Regulation (EC) No 300/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council(24), Regulation (EU) No 167/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council(25), Regulation (EU) No 168/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council(26), Directive 2014/90/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council(27), Directive (EU) 2016/797 of the European Parliament and of the Council(28), Regulation (EU) 2018/858 of the European Parliament and of the Council(29), Regulation (EU) 2018/1139 of the European Parliament and of the Council(30), and Regulation (EU) 2019/2144 of the European Parliament and of the Council(31), it is appropriate to amend those acts to ensure that the Commission takes into account, on the basis of the technical and regulatory specificities of each sector, and without interfering with existing governance, conformity assessment and enforcement mechanisms and authorities established therein, the mandatory requirements for high-risk AI systems laid down in this Regulation when adopting any relevant delegated or implementing acts on the basis of those acts.
Springlex and this text is meant purely as a documentation tool and has no legal effect. No liability is assumed for its content. The authentic version of this act is the one published in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Definition
conformity assessment
Definition
safety component
Definition
AI system
Footnote 24
Footnote 30
Footnote 28
Footnote 31
Footnote 27
Footnote 29
Footnote 59
Footnote 25
Footnote 26