Source: OJ L, 2024/1689, 12.7.2024Current language: EN
- Artificial intelligence act
Basic legislative acts
- AI act regulation
Article 105 Amendment to Directive 2014/90/EU
Summary What does Article 105 of the AI act regulation say?
This is an amendment article that bridges the AI Act with existing marine equipment legislation, specifically Directive 2014/90/EU on marine equipment.
It inserts a new paragraph into Article 8 of that Directive, ensuring that when the Commission exercises its powers under that article — including carrying out activities and adopting technical specifications and testing standards — it must take into account the high-risk AI system requirements set out in Chapter III, Section 2 of the AI Act.
The article is essentially a coordination mechanism, ensuring that AI systems functioning as safety components in the marine equipment sector are governed consistently with the broader AI regulatory framework.
Important points:
- The Commission is required to take into account the AI Act's Chapter III, Section 2 requirements when carrying out activities and adopting technical specifications and testing standards under Directive 2014/90/EU.
- This article only applies where an AI system qualifies as a safety component within the meaning of the AI Act.
- This article directly amends Directive 2014/90/EU, making it one of several sectoral amendment articles in the AI Act designed to align existing Union harmonisation legislation with the new AI rules.
Springlex's summary of the article, a reading aid, not a substitute for the legal text.
In Article 8 of Directive 2014/90/EU, the following paragraph is added:
For Artificial Intelligence systems which are safety components within the meaning of Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 of the European Parliament and of the Council(61), when carrying out its activities pursuant to paragraph 1 and when adopting technical specifications and testing standards in accordance with paragraphs 2 and 3, the Commission shall take into account the requirements set out in Chapter III, Section 2, of that Regulation.
Relevant recitals
Recital 49 Amendments to other acts
As regards high-risk AI systems that are safety components of products or systems, or which are themselves products or systems falling within the scope of Regulation (EC) No 300/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council(24), Regulation (EU) No 167/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council(25), Regulation (EU) No 168/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council(26), Directive 2014/90/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council(27), Directive (EU) 2016/797 of the European Parliament and of the Council(28), Regulation (EU) 2018/858 of the European Parliament and of the Council(29), Regulation (EU) 2018/1139 of the European Parliament and of the Council(30), and Regulation (EU) 2019/2144 of the European Parliament and of the Council(31), it is appropriate to amend those acts to ensure that the Commission takes into account, on the basis of the technical and regulatory specificities of each sector, and without interfering with existing governance, conformity assessment and enforcement mechanisms and authorities established therein, the mandatory requirements for high-risk AI systems laid down in this Regulation when adopting any relevant delegated or implementing acts on the basis of those acts.
Springlex and this text is meant purely as a documentation tool and has no legal effect. No liability is assumed for its content. The authentic version of this act is the one published in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Definition
conformity assessment
Definition
safety component
Definition
AI system
Footnote 24
Footnote 30
Footnote 28
Footnote 31
Footnote 27
Footnote 29
Footnote 25
Footnote 26
Footnote 61