Source: OJ L, 2024/1689, 12.7.2024

Current language: EN

Article 93 Power to request measures


Summary What does Article 93 of the AI act regulation say?

This article sets out the corrective powers available to the Commission when dealing with providers of general-purpose AI models.

It flows directly from Article 92, which covers the evaluation process — Article 93 is essentially what happens next if that evaluation reveals problems.

The Commission can require providers to come into compliance, implement risk mitigation measures, or in the most serious cases, restrict, withdraw, or recall the model from the market entirely.

Notably, the process includes a structured dialogue step that the AI Office may initiate before any formal measure is requested, and where a provider voluntarily offers commitments during that dialogue, the Commission has the power to make those commitments legally binding and close the matter.

Important points:

  • The Commission has the power to require providers of general-purpose AI models to take compliance measures, implement mitigations, or withdraw their model from the market.
  • The AI Office may initiate a structured dialogue with a provider before any formal corrective measure is issued.
  • If a provider offers commitments to address a systemic risk during that dialogue, the Commission can make those commitments binding and declare no further action is needed.

Springlex's summary of the article, a reading aid, not a substitute for the legal text.

    1. Where necessary and appropriate, the Commission may request providers to:

      1. take appropriate measures to comply with the obligations set out in Articles 53 and 54;

      2. implement mitigation measures, where the evaluation carried out in accordance with Article 92 has given rise to serious and substantiated concern of a systemic risk at Union level;

      3. restrict the making available on the market, withdraw or recall the model.

    1. Before a measure is requested, the AI Office may initiate a structured dialogue with the provider of the general-purpose AI model.

    1. If, during the structured dialogue referred to in paragraph 2, the provider of the general-purpose AI model with systemic risk offers commitments to implement mitigation measures to address a systemic risk at Union level, the Commission may, by decision, make those commitments binding and declare that there are no further grounds for action.

We're continuously improving our platform to serve you better.

Your feedback matters! Let us know how we can improve.

Found a bug?

Springflod is a Swedish boutique consultancy firm specialising in cyber security within the financial services sector.

We offer professional services concerning information security governance, risk and compliance.

Crafted with ❤️ by Springflod