Source: OJ L, 2024/1689, 12.7.2024Current language: EN
- Artificial intelligence act
Basic legislative acts
- AI act regulation
Article 98 Committee procedure
Summary What does Article 98 of the AI act regulation say?
This is a brief procedural article that establishes the committee structure supporting the Commission in its implementation of the regulation.
It links directly to Regulation (EU) No 182/2011, which governs the general rules and principles for how Member States control the Commission's exercise of implementing powers.
By referencing Article 5 of that regulation, this article invokes the standard "examination procedure," which is the mechanism used throughout the AI Act whenever the Commission is empowered to adopt implementing acts.
Important points:
- The Commission is assisted by a committee established under the framework of Regulation (EU) No 182/2011.
- The examination procedure under Article 5 of Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 applies wherever that paragraph is referenced elsewhere in the AI Act.
- This article serves as the procedural backbone for the numerous implementing acts the Commission is empowered to adopt across the regulation.
Springlex's summary of the article, a reading aid, not a substitute for the legal text.
The Commission shall be assisted by a committee. That committee shall be a committee within the meaning of Regulation (EU) No 182/2011.
Where reference is made to this paragraph, Article 5 of Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 shall apply.
Relevant recitals
Recital 173 Delegations to the Commission
In order to ensure that the regulatory framework can be adapted where necessary, the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 TFEU should be delegated to the Commission to amend the conditions under which an AI system is not to be considered to be high-risk, the list of high-risk AI systems, the provisions regarding technical documentation, the content of the EU declaration of conformity the provisions regarding the conformity assessment procedures, the provisions establishing the high-risk AI systems to which the conformity assessment procedure based on assessment of the quality management system and assessment of the technical documentation should apply, the threshold, benchmarks and indicators, including by supplementing those benchmarks and indicators, in the rules for the classification of general-purpose AI models with systemic risk, the criteria for the designation of general-purpose AI models with systemic risk, the technical documentation for providers of general-purpose AI models and the transparency information for providers of general-purpose AI models. It is of particular importance that the Commission carry out appropriate consultations during its preparatory work, including at expert level, and that those consultations be conducted in accordance with the principles laid down in the Interinstitutional Agreement of 13 April 2016 on Better Law-Making(55). In particular, to ensure equal participation in the preparation of delegated acts, the European Parliament and the Council receive all documents at the same time as Member States’ experts, and their experts systematically have access to meetings of Commission expert groups dealing with the preparation of delegated acts.
Recital 175 Commission assisted by a committee
In order to ensure uniform conditions for the implementation of this Regulation, implementing powers should be conferred on the Commission. Those powers should be exercised in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council(56).
Springlex and this text is meant purely as a documentation tool and has no legal effect. No liability is assumed for its content. The authentic version of this act is the one published in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Definition
conformity assessment
Definition
provider
Definition
high-impact capabilities
Definition
systemic risk
Definition
AI system
Definition
risk
Definition
general-purpose AI model
Footnote 56
Footnote 55