Source: OJ L, 2024/1620, 19.6.2024

Current language: EN

Article 102 Evaluation and review


Summary What does Article 102 of the Anti-money laundering authority regulation (AMLAR) say?

This article establishes a formal review mechanism whereby the Commission is required to periodically assess the overall performance of the Authority.

It is a comprehensive evaluation clause covering virtually every dimension of the Authority's operation — from its governance and supervisory effectiveness to its cooperation with other bodies and its cost efficiency.

Notably, every second report must include a deeper assessment of whether the Authority's continued existence remains justified in light of its mandate and achievements.

The reports are forwarded to the European Parliament and the Council, ensuring institutional oversight of the Authority at the highest level.

Important points:

  • The Commission is required to produce a performance report on the Authority by 31 December 2030, and every five years thereafter, covering areas including supervisory effectiveness, governance, sanctioning powers, and cooperation with other bodies.
  • Each report must also examine whether the Authority's resources are adequate and whether it should be granted additional supervisory or sanctioning powers, including over non-financial sector obliged entities.
  • Every second report must include an assessment of whether the continuation of the Authority is still justified given its objectives, mandate, tasks and powers.

Springlex's summary of the article, a reading aid, not a substitute for the legal text.

    1. By 31 December 2030, and every five years thereafter, the Commission shall draw up a report on the Authority’s performance in relation to its objectives, mandate, tasks and location, in accordance with the Commission’s guidelines. That report shall, in particular, address:

      1. the possible need to amend the mandate of the Authority, and the financial implications of any such amendment;

      2. the impact of all supervisory activities and tasks of the Authority on the interests of the Union as a whole, and specifically the effectiveness of:

        1. supervisory tasks and activities related to direct supervision of selected obliged entities;

        2. indirect supervision of non-selected obliged entities;

        3. indirect oversight of other obliged entities;

      3. the impact of the activities related to support and coordination of FIUs, and in particular the coordination of the joint analyses of cross-border activities and transactions conducted by FIUs;

      4. the impartiality, objectivity and autonomy of the Authority;

      5. the appropriateness of governance arrangements, including the composition of, and voting arrangements in, the Executive Board and its relationship with the General Board;

      6. the cost effectiveness of the Authority, if appropriate, separately in relation to its distinct sources of funding;

      7. the effectiveness of the recourse mechanism against decisions of the Authority and the independence and accountability arrangements applicable to the Authority;

      8. the effectiveness of cooperation and information sharing arrangements between the Authority and non-AML/CFT authorities;

      9. the interaction between the Authority and the other Union supervisory authorities and bodies, including the EBA, Europol, Eurojust, OLAF and the EPPO;

      10. the scope of direct supervision and the criteria and methodology for the assessment and selection of entities for direct supervision;

      11. the effectiveness of the Authority’s supervisory and sanctioning powers;

      12. the effectiveness of, and convergence in, supervisory practices reached by supervisory authorities and the role of the Authority therein.

    1. The report referred to in paragraph 1 shall also examine whether:

      1. the resources of the Authority are adequate to carry out its responsibilities;

      2. it is appropriate to confer on the Authority additional supervisory tasks regarding obliged entities in the non-financial sector, specifying, as appropriate, the types of entities that should be subject to the additional supervisory tasks;

      3. it is appropriate to confer on the Authority additional tasks in the area of support and coordination of the work of FIUs;

      4. it is appropriate to confer on the Authority additional sanctioning powers.

    1. In every second report, the Commission shall conduct a thorough review of the results achieved by the Authority having regard to its objectives, mandate, tasks and powers, including an assessment of whether the continuation of the Authority is still justified with regard to these objectives, mandate and tasks.

    1. The report and any accompanying proposals, as appropriate, shall be forwarded to the European Parliament and to the Council.

We're continuously improving our platform to serve you better.

Your feedback matters! Let us know how we can improve.

Found a bug?

Springflod is a Swedish boutique consultancy firm specialising in cyber security within the financial services sector.

We offer professional services concerning information security governance, risk and compliance.

Crafted with ❤️ by Springflod