Source: OJ L, 2024/1620, 19.6.2024Current language: EN
- Anti-money laundering
Basic legislative acts
- Anti-money laundering authority regulation (AMLAR)
Article 41 Reporting and transmission of the results of joint analyses
Summary What does Article 41 of the Anti-money laundering authority regulation (AMLAR) say?
This article governs how the Authority must act when joint analysis results give rise to reasonable grounds for suspicion of criminal activity.
It establishes a set of reporting obligations and information-sharing channels connecting the Authority to key EU enforcement bodies — specifically the EPPO, OLAF, Europol, and Eurojust — each triggered by different types of suspected wrongdoing.
The article builds directly on Article 40, which sets out the joint analysis process itself, and connects to Article 94, which governs the working arrangements underpinning broader inter-agency cooperation.
Important points:
- The Authority is required to report joint analysis results to the EPPO without undue delay where money laundering or related criminal activity is suspected, and must develop technical standards specifying the format for such reporting in consultation with the EPPO.
- Transmission of results to Europol and Eurojust requires the express consent of all FIUs that participated in the joint analysis, whereas reporting to OLAF and the EPPO does not carry this consent requirement.
- The Authority, EPPO, Europol, Eurojust, and OLAF may exchange strategic and non-operational information, such as typologies and risk indicators, with the conditions for such exchange to be set out in working arrangements under Article 94.
Springlex's summary of the article, a reading aid, not a substitute for the legal text.
Where the results of a joint analysis indicate that there are reasonable grounds to suspect that money laundering or other criminal activities are being or have been committed in respect of which the EPPO could exercise its competence in accordance with Article 22 and Article 25(2) and (3) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1939, the Authority shall report without undue delay the results of the joint analysis and any additional relevant information to the EPPO.
The Authority shall, in consultation with the EPPO, develop draft implementing technical standards to specify the format to be used by the Authority for the reporting of information to the EPPO.
The Authority shall submit those draft implementing technical standards to the Commission by 27 June 2026.
The Commission is empowered to adopt the implementing technical standards referred to in the first subparagraph in accordance with Article 53.
Where the results of the joint analysis indicate that there are reasonable grounds to suspect that fraud, corruption or any other illegal activity affecting the financial interests of the Union is being or has been committed in respect of which the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) could exercise its competence in accordance with Article 8 of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 883/2013, the Authority shall transmit the results of the joint analysis and any additional relevant information to OLAF.
Upon the express consent of all FIUs participating in the joint analysis and where the results of the joint analysis indicate that there are reasonable grounds to suspect that a criminal offence has been committed in respect of which Europol could exercise its competence in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2016/794 of the European Parliament and of the Council(38), the Authority shall transmit the results of the joint analysis and any additional relevant information to Europol.
Upon the express consent of all FIUs participating in the joint analysis, and where the results of the joint analysis indicate that there are reasonable grounds to suspect that a criminal offence has been committed in respect of which Eurojust could exercise its competence in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2018/1727 of the European Parliament and of the Council(39), the Authority shall transmit the results of the joint analysis and any additional relevant information to Eurojust.
The Authority, the EPPO, Europol, Eurojust and OLAF may exchange strategic and other non-operational information, such as typologies and risk indicators, in the areas within their competence.
The conditions for the exchange of the information referred to in the first subparagraph shall be laid down in the working arrangements referred to in Article 94.
Springlex and this text is meant purely as a documentation tool and has no legal effect. No liability is assumed for its content. The authentic version of this act is the one published in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Definition
property
Definition
money laundering
Definition
third country
Definition
criminal activity
Footnote 39
Footnote 38