Source: OJ L, 2024/1624, 19.6.2024

Current language: EN

Article 36 Specific enhanced due diligence measures for cross-border correspondent relationships


Summary What does Article 36 of the Anti-money laundering regulation (AMLR) say?

This article sets out the enhanced due diligence obligations that apply specifically to credit institutions and financial institutions when entering into cross-border correspondent relationships with third-country respondent institutions.

It builds directly on the standard customer due diligence measures in Article 20, layering on additional requirements that reflect the heightened risk these relationships can carry.

The core thrust is that institutions must actively understand, assess, and document the respondent before and during the relationship — not simply apply routine checks.

Important points:

  • When entering a cross-border correspondent relationship with a third-country institution, gather sufficient information on the respondent's business and reputation, assess its AML/CFT controls, obtain senior management approval, and document the responsibilities of each party.
  • For payable-through accounts specifically, satisfy yourself that the respondent institution has verified and performed ongoing due diligence on customers with direct access to the correspondent's accounts, and that it can provide that data upon request.
  • If you decide to terminate a cross-border correspondent relationship for AML/CFT policy reasons, document that decision.

Springlex's summary of the article, a reading aid, not a substitute for the legal text.

  1. With respect to cross-border correspondent relationships, including relationships established for securities transactions or fund transfers, involving the execution of payments with a third-country respondent institution, in addition to the customer due diligence measures laid down in Article 20, credit institutions and financial institutions shall, when entering into a business relationship, be required to:

    1. gather sufficient information about the respondent institution to understand fully the nature of the respondent’s business and to determine from publicly available information the reputation of the institution and the quality of supervision;

    2. assess the respondent institution’s AML/CFT controls;

    3. obtain approval from senior management before establishing new correspondent relationships;

    4. document the respective responsibilities of each institution;

    5. with respect to payable-through accounts, be satisfied that the respondent institution has verified the identity of, and performed ongoing due diligence on, the customers having direct access to accounts of the correspondent institution, and that it is able to provide relevant customer due diligence data to the correspondent institution, upon request.

  2. Where credit institutions and financial institutions decide to terminate cross-border correspondent relationships for reasons relating to AML/CFT policy, they shall document their decision.

We're continuously improving our platform to serve you better.

Your feedback matters! Let us know how we can improve.

Found a bug?

Springflod is a Swedish boutique consultancy firm specialising in cyber security within the financial services sector.

We offer professional services concerning information security governance, risk and compliance.

Crafted with ❤️ by Springflod