Source: OJ L, 2024/1624, 19.6.2024

Current language: EN

Article 39 Prohibition of correspondent relationships with shell institutions


Summary What does Article 39 of the Anti-money laundering regulation (AMLR) say?

This article establishes a hard prohibition on correspondent relationships with shell institutions, extending the controls on correspondent banking introduced in Article 36 by setting an absolute boundary that cannot be managed through enhanced due diligence alone.

Credit institutions and financial institutions are barred from entering into or continuing any correspondent relationship with a shell institution, and must also take appropriate measures to ensure they are not indirectly connected to shell institutions through intermediary firms that are known to allow shell institutions to use their accounts.

The article then extends a parallel obligation to crypto-asset service providers, requiring them to have internal policies, procedures and controls in place to prevent their accounts from being used to provide unregulated crypto-asset services.

Important points:

  • Do not enter into or continue any correspondent relationship with a shell institution, and take appropriate measures to avoid indirect exposure through intermediaries known to facilitate shell institutions.
  • The prohibition covers not just direct relationships but also correspondent relationships with entities known to allow shell institutions access to their accounts.
  • Crypto-asset service providers must implement internal policies, procedures and controls specifically designed to detect and prevent attempts to use their accounts for the provision of unregulated crypto-asset services.

Springlex's summary of the article, a reading aid, not a substitute for the legal text.

    1. Credit institutions and financial institutions shall not enter into, or continue, a correspondent relationship with a shell institution. Credit institutions and financial institutions shall take appropriate measures to ensure that they do not engage in or continue correspondent relationships with a credit institution or financial institution that is known to allow its accounts to be used by a shell institution.

    1. In addition to the requirement laid down in paragraph 1, crypto-asset service providers shall ensure that their accounts are not used by shell institutions to provide crypto-asset services. To that end, crypto-asset service providers shall have in place internal policies, procedures and controls to detect any attempt to use their accounts for the provision of unregulated crypto-asset services.

We're continuously improving our platform to serve you better.

Your feedback matters! Let us know how we can improve.

Found a bug?

Springflod is a Swedish boutique consultancy firm specialising in cyber security within the financial services sector.

We offer professional services concerning information security governance, risk and compliance.

Crafted with ❤️ by Springflod