Article 2 Definitions


This is a draft act

This text has been parsed from the AMLA final report draft as published on 3 July 2026. While we run a suite of validations, the automated parsing can result in errors. Also, before it is finally adopted by the Commission, its wording, numbering and references may change, and entire articles might be removed or added.

Summary What does Article 2 of the ITS on AMLA reporting to the EPPO say?

This is a definitions article, establishing the precise meaning of four key terms used throughout the Regulation.

Its primary purpose is to set boundaries around how reported information can be used, distinguishing between different permitted uses such as judicial proceedings and intelligence analysis.

These definitions are directly relevant to Article 6, which governs how AMLA must indicate the permitted use of the information it reports to the EPPO.

Important points:

  • The four definitions cover the technical format for submissions and three distinct categories of permitted use for reported information.
  • "Judicial purposes" and "intelligence purposes" are defined as mutually exclusive: the former involves use as evidence in proceedings, while the latter explicitly excludes such use.
  • "Cooperation in criminal matters" specifically relates to formal EPPO requests made to non-participating Member States or third countries, not to cooperation within the EPPO framework itself.

Springlex's summary of the article is a reading aid, not a substitute for the legal text.

  1. For the purpose of this Regulation, the following definitions shall apply:

    1. ‘machine-readable format’ means a format that software applications can automatically process, without human intervention, such as XML.

    2. ‘judicial purposes’ means the use of the reported information for criminal proceedings, including its use as evidence before judicial authorities or for supporting applications or requests made in the context of such proceedings.

    3. ‘intelligence purposes’ means the use of the reported information by competent authorities for analysing and processing it in order to identify possible money laundering, terrorist financing or related criminal conduct, without the information being used as evidence in judicial proceedings.

    4. ‘cooperation in criminal matters’ means formal requests made by the EPPO to authorities of a Member State not participating in the enhanced cooperation on the establishment of the EPPO or to authorities of a third country for assistance in the context of criminal proceedings, including requests to obtain evidence, gather information, identify or trace persons or assets, or perform procedural acts necessary for the investigation or prosecution of offences.

We're continuously improving our platform to serve you better.

Your feedback matters! Let us know how we can improve.

Found a bug?

Springflod is a Swedish boutique consultancy firm specialising in cyber security within the financial services sector.

We offer professional services concerning information security governance, risk and compliance.

Crafted with ❤️ by Springflod