Article 3 Criteria for identifying linked transactions


This is a draft act

This text has been parsed from the AMLA consultation paper draft as published on 9 February 2026. While we run a suite of validations, the automated parsing can result in errors. Also, before it is finally adopted by the Commission, its wording, numbering and references may change, and entire articles might be removed or added.

Summary What does Article 3 of the RTS on criteria for business relationships and occasional transactions say?

This article sets out the criteria that obliged entities must use when identifying linked transactions — that is, two or more transactions sharing identical or similar origin, destination, purpose, or other relevant characteristics over a specific period.

It maps a range of indicators across each element of that definition, covering things like shared customer relationships, common infrastructure, and transactional dependencies.

The article also carves out specific rules for certain categories of obliged entity: currency exchange offices, money remittance providers, and crypto-asset service providers are given a fixed rolling period of one month when assessing the time element, rather than the general flexible approach.

Gambling service providers receive an additional criterion relating to purpose.

This article complements Article 2, which addresses how to distinguish a business relationship from an occasional transaction.

Important points:

  • Apply a broad set of criteria when identifying linked transactions, including shared customer connections, common digital infrastructure, and transactions dependent on prior completion of other transactions handled by the same entity.
  • Currency exchange offices, money remittance providers, and certain crypto-asset service providers must use a rolling period of one month as the specific timeframe criterion for identifying linked transactions.
  • Gambling service providers must additionally consider whether transactions relate to games provided by the same provider when assessing identical or similar purpose.

Springlex's summary of the article, a reading aid, not a substitute for the legal text.

    1. Obliged entities shall, for the purpose of identifying linked transactions, at least take into account the following criteria:

      1. when considering the elements of identical or similar origin and destination included in the definition of linked transactions, transactions performed or received by the same natural or legal person.

      2. when considering the elements of identical or similar origin and destination included in the definition of linked transactions, based on information available to the obliged entity:

        1. customers are family members;

        2. customers are business partners;

        3. customers are operating in concert;

        4. customers are subsidiaries or beneficial owners of the same parent undertaking;

        5. use of the same digital infrastructure;

        6. use of common intermediaries or service providers facilitating transactions.

      3. when considering the element of identical or similar purpose included in the definition of linked transactions, based on information available to the obliged entity, transactions pertaining to the same purchase.

      4. when considering the element of other relevant characteristics included in the definition of linked transactions:

        1. based on information available to the obliged entity, transactions share common characteristics;

        2. transactions with an identical or similar origin and destination according to the definition of linked transactions, performed at different establishments or through a network of agents or distributors;

        3. transactions with an identical or similar origin according to the definition of linked transactions, performed within a loyalty program;

        4. completion of a transaction that depends on the prior completion of one or multiple transactions, all of which are handled by the same obliged entity.

      5. when considering the element of a specific period included in the definition of linked transactions, transactions performed within a short timeframe, depending on the nature of the business, including its risks and complexity and the size of the obliged entity.

    1. By way of derogation from paragraph 1, point (e), financial institutions carrying out the activities of currency exchange offices as defined in Article 2(6), point (a) or Regulation (EU) 2024/1624, obliged entities engaged in the activity of money remittance as defined in Article 4, point (22) of Directive (EU) 2015/2366 and obliged entities providing the services as set out in Article 3(1), points (16) (c), and (d) and (j) of Regulation (EU) 2023/1114, shall for the purpose of identifying linked transactions, at least take into account the criterion of a rolling period of one month, when considering the element of a specific period included in the definition of linked transactions.

    1. In addition to the criteria set out in paragraph 1, point (c), providers of gambling services shall, for the purpose of identifying linked transactions, take into account the criterion of games provided by the same provider when considering the element of identical or similar purpose included in the definition of linked transactions.

We're continuously improving our platform to serve you better.

Your feedback matters! Let us know how we can improve.

Found a bug?

Springflod is a Swedish boutique consultancy firm specialising in cyber security within the financial services sector.

We offer professional services concerning information security governance, risk and compliance.

Crafted with ❤️ by Springflod