Article 5 Group-wide risk assessment


This is a draft act

This text has been parsed from the AMLA final report draft as published on 16 December 2025. While we run a suite of validations, the automated parsing can result in errors. Also, before it is finally adopted by the Commission, its wording, numbering and references may change, and entire articles might be removed or added.

Summary What does Article 5 of the RTS on risk assessment to select institutions for direct supervision say?

This article extends the entity-level residual risk scoring methodology established in Articles 2, 3, and 4 to the group level.

The Authority, working together with financial supervisors, is required to calculate a single group-wide residual risk score by aggregating the individual residual risk scores of all Union-based credit and financial institutions within a group.

The same aggregation logic applies to solo institutions that operate through one or more branches.

A weighted arithmetic average formula is used for this aggregation, with the design deliberately skewing the result upward where riskier entities are present within the group.

The resulting score is then converted into the same four-tier classification used at entity level: low, medium, substantial, or high.

Important points:

  • The Authority, in collaboration with financial supervisors, is required to calculate and classify the group-wide residual risk profile by aggregating entity-level residual risk scores of all Union-based members of the group.
  • The aggregation formula is designed to give greater weight to riskier entities within the group, meaning a small number of high-risk members can pull the overall group score upward.
  • Each entity's relevance within the group — and therefore its weight in the calculation — is measured using three data points: number of customers, total transaction volumes, and total assets held or managed, all as of 31 December of the previous year.

Springlex's summary of the article, a reading aid, not a substitute for the legal text.

    1. The Authority, in collaboration with financial supervisors, shall calculate the group- wide risk profile of a group of credit or financial institutions by aggregating the entity- level residual risk scores of all the credit institutions and financial institutions established in the Union, and which are part of the group.

    2. This paragraph shall also apply, mutatis mutandis, to credit institutions or financial institutions that are not part of a group, and that carry out domestic or cross-border activities through one or more branches, for calculation of the aggregated risk profile of such a credit institution or a financial institution and of its branches.

    1. The aggregation referred to in paragraph 1 shall be based on a weighted arithmetic average method, with weights proportional to the relevance of each credit institution or financial institution within the group and enhancing the contribution of riskier entities. For the purpose of the aggregation, the following formula shall be applied:

      1. (i=1Nw[i]r[i]α)1α
      2. Where:

        N: number of entities in the group

        r[i]: residual risk score of entity i

        w[i]: weight representing the relevance of entity i within the group

        α1: parameter to enhance the contribution of risker entities

    1. The relevance of each credit institution or financial institution within the group shall be measured in accordance with the data points listed in Section A of Annex I, based on:

      1. the number of its customers on 31 December of the previous year; and

      2. the total amount in euro of incoming and outgoing transactions carried out in the previous year or the equivalent in national currency; and

      3. the total amount in euro of the assets held or managed by the credit institution or financial institution on 31 December of the previous year.

    1. The result of the aggregation carried out in accordance paragraph 2 shall be converted into a numerical group-wide residual risk score with two decimal places, ranging between 1, that corresponds to the lowest level of risk, to 4, that corresponds to the highest level of risk.

    1. Depending on the residual risk score of the group of credit and financial institutions, its residual risk profile shall be classified as low, medium, substantial or high, in accordance with the following conversion rule:

      1. Score<1.75: Low risk (1)
      2. 1.75Score<2.5: Medium risk (2)
      3. 2.5Score<3.25: Substantial risk (3)
      4. Score3.25: High risk (4)

We're continuously improving our platform to serve you better.

Your feedback matters! Let us know how we can improve.

Found a bug?

Springflod is a Swedish boutique consultancy firm specialising in cyber security within the financial services sector.

We offer professional services concerning information security governance, risk and compliance.

Crafted with ❤️ by Springflod