Source: OJ L 2024/2847, 20.11.2024

Current language: EN

Article 56 Procedure at Union level concerning products with digital elements presenting a significant cybersecurity risk


Summary What does Article 56 of the CRA regulation say?

This article establishes the Commission's own powers of intervention when a product with digital elements presents a significant cybersecurity risk and national-level action has proven insufficient.

It sits alongside Articles 54 and 55, which govern market surveillance authority evaluations and national procedures, but goes further by giving the Commission a direct escalation path.

Where the Commission has sufficient reason to believe a product is non-compliant or poses risks — including non-technical risk factors — it can alert market surveillance authorities, engage ENISA for analysis, consult Member States and economic operators, and ultimately adopt implementing acts imposing corrective or restrictive measures at Union level, up to and including market withdrawal or recall.

This intervention power is explicitly time-limited, applying only for the duration of the exceptional situation that triggered it.

Important points:

  • The Commission is empowered to act at Union level — including ordering market withdrawal or recall — where national market surveillance authorities have not taken effective measures against a non-compliant product presenting a significant cybersecurity risk.
  • Non-technical risk factors can also trigger the Commission's intervention, in which case it must additionally inform relevant competent authorities under Directive (EU) 2022/2555 and consider the implications for Union-level critical supply chain risk assessments.
  • Economic operators are required to cooperate with ENISA when the Commission carries out its compliance evaluation, and Member States must implement any resulting implementing acts without delay.

Springlex's summary of the article, a reading aid, not a substitute for the legal text.

    1. Where the Commission has sufficient reason to consider, including based on information provided by ENISA, that a product with digital elements that presents a significant cybersecurity risk does not comply with the requirements laid down in this Regulation, it shall inform the relevant market surveillance authorities. Where the market surveillance authorities carry out an evaluation of that product with digital elements that may present a significant cybersecurity risk in respect of its compliance with the requirements laid down in this Regulation, the procedures referred to in Articles 54 and 55 shall apply.

    1. Where the Commission has sufficient reason to consider that a product with digital elements presents a significant cybersecurity risk in light of non-technical risk factors, it shall inform the relevant market surveillance authorities and, where appropriate, the competent authorities designated or established pursuant to Article 8 of Directive (EU) 2022/2555 and cooperate with those authorities as necessary. The Commission shall also consider the relevance of the identified risks for that product with digital elements in view of its tasks regarding the Union level coordinated security risk assessments of critical supply chains provided for in Article 22 of Directive (EU) 2022/2555, and consult, as necessary, the Cooperation Group established pursuant to Article 14 of Directive (EU) 2022/2555 and ENISA.

    1. In circumstances which justify an immediate intervention to preserve the proper functioning of the internal market and where the Commission has sufficient reason to consider that the product with digital elements referred to in paragraph 1 remains non-compliant with the requirements laid down in this Regulation and no effective measures have been taken by the relevant market surveillance authorities, the Commission shall carry out an evaluation of compliance and may request ENISA to provide an analysis to support it. The Commission shall inform the relevant market surveillance authorities accordingly. The relevant economic operators shall cooperate with ENISA as necessary.

    1. Based on the evaluation referred to in paragraph 3, the Commission may decide that a corrective or restrictive measure is necessary at Union level. To that end, it shall without delay consult the Member States concerned and the relevant economic operator or operators.

    1. On the basis of the consultation referred to in paragraph 4 of this Article, the Commission may adopt implementing acts to provide for corrective or restrictive measures at Union level, including requiring the products with digital elements concerned to be withdrawn from the market or recalled, within a reasonable period, commensurate with the nature of the risk. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 62(2).

    1. The Commission shall immediately communicate the implementing acts referred to in paragraph 5 to the relevant economic operator or operators. Member States shall implement those implementing acts without delay and shall inform the Commission accordingly.

    1. Paragraphs 3 to 6 shall be applicable for the duration of the exceptional situation that justified the Commission’s intervention, provided that the product with digital elements concerned is not brought in compliance with this Regulation.

We're continuously improving our platform to serve you better.

Your feedback matters! Let us know how we can improve.

Found a bug?

Springflod is a Swedish boutique consultancy firm specialising in cyber security within the financial services sector.

We offer professional services concerning information security governance, risk and compliance.

Crafted with ❤️ by Springflod