Article 4 Change of the membership in the joint examination team

Summary What does Article 4 of the RTS on joint examination teams say?

This article establishes a performance review mechanism for members of the joint examination team.

It builds directly on Article 2, which defines the material changes that can trigger a reassessment of the team's composition.

Here, those same triggers — alongside periodic reviews and a change in Lead Overseer — activate a formal assessment of team members' results, which then informs decisions about whether the team's membership should be changed.

Important points:

The Lead Overseer is required to consult joint examination team members before assessing their results.
Both the Lead Overseer and the nominating authorities must use the assessment results to decide whether membership changes are appropriate.
The review is triggered periodically, upon a change in Lead Overseer, or when material changes as defined in Article 2(2) occur.

Springlex's summary of the article, a reading aid, not a substitute for the legal text.

Periodically, or where the Lead Overseer changes, or where material changes as specified in Article 2(2) occur, the Lead Overseer, after having consulted the members of the joint examination team, shall assess the results of the members of the joint examination team. Both the nominating authorities and Lead Overseer shall use the results of that assessment to decide whether it is appropriate to change the membership of the joint examination team.

Table of contents

Springlex and this text is meant purely as a documentation tool and has no legal effect. No liability is assumed for its content. The authentic version of this act is the one published in the Official Journal of the European Union.