Source: OJ L, 2024/1774, 25.6.2024

Current language: EN

Article 6 Encryption and cryptographic controls


Summary What does Article 6 of the RTS on ICT risk management framework say?

This article requires financial entities to develop, document, and implement a dedicated policy on encryption and cryptographic controls, forming part of the broader ICT security framework referenced in Article 9(2) of DORA.

It sets out the core content that this policy must cover, including encryption of data at rest, in transit, and in use, as well as the management of cryptographic keys — the latter of which directly feeds into Article 7.

Notably, the article builds in a degree of flexibility: where encryption of data in use is not possible, or where leading practices and standards cannot be met, financial entities must adopt alternative mitigation and monitoring measures and record the reasons for doing so.

Important points:

  • Develop, document, and implement an encryption and cryptographic controls policy, grounded in data classification and ICT risk assessment results.
  • The policy must address cryptographic key management in line with Article 7, and must include provisions for updating cryptographic technology as cryptanalysis evolves.
  • Where full compliance with leading practices or standards is not possible, adopt and record mitigation and monitoring measures, along with a reasoned explanation.

Springlex's summary of the article, a reading aid, not a substitute for the legal text.

    1. As part of their ICT security policies, procedures, protocols, and tools referred to in Article 9(2) of Regulation (EU) 2022/2554, financial entities shall develop, document, and implement a policy on encryption and cryptographic controls.

    1. Financial entities shall design the policy on encryption and cryptographic controls referred to in paragraph 1 on the basis of the results of an approved data classification and ICT risk assessment. That policy shall contain rules for all of the following:

      1. the encryption of data at rest and in transit;

      2. the encryption of data in use, where necessary;

      3. the encryption of internal network connections and traffic with external parties;

      4. the cryptographic key management referred to in Article 7, laying down rules on the correct use, protection, and lifecycle of cryptographic keys.

    2. For the purposes of point (b), where encryption of data in use is not possible, financial entities shall process data in use in a separated and protected environment, or take equivalent measures to ensure the confidentiality, integrity, authenticity, and availability of data.

    1. Financial entities shall include in the policy on encryption and cryptographic controls referred to in paragraph 1 criteria for the selection of cryptographic techniques and use practices, taking into account leading practices, and standards as defined in Article 2, point (1), of Regulation (EU) No 1025/2012, and the classification of relevant ICT assets established in accordance with Article 8(1) of Regulation (EU) 2022/2554. Financial entities that are not able to adhere to the leading practices or standards, or to use the most reliable techniques, shall adopt mitigation and monitoring measures that ensure resilience against cyber threats.

    1. Financial entities shall include in the policy on encryption and cryptographic controls referred to in paragraph 1 provisions for updating or changing, where necessary, the cryptographic technology on the basis of developments in cryptanalysis. Those updates or changes shall ensure that the cryptographic technology remains resilient against cyber threats, as required by Article 10(2), point (a). Financial entities that are not able to update or change the cryptographic technology shall adopt mitigation and monitoring measures that ensure resilience against cyber threats.

    1. Financial entities shall include in the policy on encryption and cryptographic controls referred to in paragraph 1 a requirement to record the adoption of mitigation and monitoring measures adopted in accordance with paragraphs 3 and 4 and to provide a reasoned explanation for doing so.

We're continuously improving our platform to serve you better.

Your feedback matters! Let us know how we can improve.

Found a bug?

Springflod is a Swedish boutique consultancy firm specialising in cyber security within the financial services sector.

We offer professional services concerning information security governance, risk and compliance.

Crafted with ❤️ by Springflod