Source: OJ L, 2024/1503, 30.5.2024Current language: EN
- Markets in crypto-assets
Significant ART/EMT issuer
- Fees charged by the EBA
Article 3 Adjustment of fees
Summary What does Article 3 of the Fees charged by the EBA say?
This is a brief but important principled article that establishes the overarching fee-setting objective underpinning the regulation.
It directly complements Articles 1 and 2, which detail how costs are estimated and fees are calculated, by anchoring those calculations to a clear financial principle: fees must achieve full cost recovery without generating either a shortfall or a significant excess of funds.
Important points:
- Fees charged to issuers of significant ARTs and significant EMTs must be set to cover the full cost of supervision.
- Ensure your fee contributions neither create a deficit nor lead to a significant accumulation of surplus for the EBA.
- This full cost recovery principle applies specifically to the supervisory services provided to issuers of significant ARTs and significant EMTs.
Springlex's summary of the article, a reading aid, not a substitute for the legal text.
Annual supervisory fees charged to issuers of significant ARTs and issuers of significant EMTs shall be set at a level such as to cover the full cost of providing the services and to avoid a deficit or a significant accumulation of surplus.
Springlex and this text is meant purely as a documentation tool and has no legal effect. No liability is assumed for its content. The authentic version of this act is the one published in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Definition
distributed ledger
Definition
consensus mechanism
Definition
crypto-asset
Definition
DLT network node
Definition
issuer
Definition
distributed ledger technology