Source: OJ L, 2024/2545, 26.11.2024

Current language: EN

Preamble Recitals


Recital 1Need for cross-border supervisory cooperation

Markets in crypto-assets are inherently cross-border. It is therefore necessary to ensure that competent authorities in different Member States can cooperate and exchange information that enables them to effectively supervise issuers and offerors of crypto-assets and crypto-asset service providers operating across the Union. Competent authorities should have access to the information necessary to allow the effective discharge of their supervisory, investigative and enforcement duties and functions.

Recital 2Common procedures and templates for assistance

To ensure that competent authorities are able to cooperate and to exchange information in an efficient and timely manner and to provide assistance to each other for the purposes of Regulation (EU) 2023/1114, it is appropriate to set out common procedures, forms and templates for the submission of requests for assistance, acknowledgments of receipts and replies to such requests.

Recital 3Written and oral communications for cooperation

Information should normally be exchanged in writing. However, oral communications should be possible in appropriate cases, including, in particular, before a written request for cooperation or exchange of information is sent, to provide information on an upcoming request for cooperation or exchange of information, or to discuss any issues that might make it difficult to comply with that request. In urgent cases, it should also be possible to orally communicate a request for cooperation or exchange of information, provided that such urgency is not due to a delay on the part of the requesting party.

Recital 4Conditions justifying urgent cooperation requests

Urgent requests for cooperation or exchange of information should be allowed where a prompt response is required by the requesting authority in order to stop significant harm or to prevent potential significant harm to investors or to the stability of and trust in the financial system. This includes cases where, for instance, the competent authority of a host Member State recently obtained evidence showing that a crypto-asset service provider authorised in another Member State is marketing crypto-assets which are not compatible with the provisions on protection of clients or retail holders set out in Article 102 of Regulation (EU) 2023/1114. Urgent requests should also be allowed where a competent authority of a host Member State has received relevant complaints relating to a crypto-asset service provider authorised in another Member State or where a competent authority has reasons to believe that a crypto-asset service provider operating in its jurisdiction is at risk of insolvency, which may affect clients in its jurisdiction or the stability of financial markets.

Recital 5Legal basis for cooperation under MiCA

Regulation (EU) 2023/1114 establishes that competent authorities are to cooperate with each other, exchange information and render assistance to each other.

Recital 6Voluntary unsolicited transmission of information

Unsolicited transmissions of information should be provided for in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2023/1114, including on a voluntary basis when the competent authority of a Member State considers that information in its possession may be of use to another competent authority. When transmitting unsolicited information, the competent authority should ensure that is has a legal basis to do so, and indicate it in the form set out in the relevant Annex.

Recital 7Information requirements for assistance requests

A request for assistance pursuant to Article 95 of Regulation (EU) 2023/1114 should provide sufficient information about the subject matter of the request, including the reason for the request and its context, to enable the requested authority to process the request efficiently and expediently. It should not be necessary for a requesting authority to indicate the facts giving rise to the suspicion of infringement that prompted the request where the requested information is necessary for that authority to fulfil its duties.

Recital 8Communication and feedback between competent authorities

The procedures for cooperation should allow and facilitate the communication, consultation and interaction between the requesting authority and the requested authority, to ensure an efficient processing of requests for information or assistance. These procedures should also allow competent authorities to provide each other with feedback on the usefulness of the information or assistance received, on the outcome of the case in relation to which the assistance was sought, and on any problems encountered in providing such information or assistance.

Recital 9Confidentiality and personal data protection safeguards

The procedures and forms for the exchange of information and assistance should ensure the confidentiality of the information exchanged or transmitted and compliance with the rules on the protection of the rights of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data.

Recital 10ESMA draft technical standards as basis

This Regulation is based on the draft implementing technical standards developed by the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) in close cooperation with European Banking Authority (EBA) and submitted to the Commission.

Recital 11Consultation of the Securities and Markets Stakeholder Group

ESMA has requested the advice of the Securities and Markets Stakeholder Group established in accordance with Article 37 of Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council(2)Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 November 2010 establishing a European Supervisory Authority (European Securities and Markets Authority), amending Decision No 716/2009/EC and repealing Commission Decision 2009/77/EC (OJ L 331, 15.12.2010, p. 84, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2010/1095/oj)..

Recital 12No public consultation due to limited impact

ESMA has not conducted open public consultations on the draft implementing technical standards on which this Regulation is based, nor has it analysed the potential related costs and benefits of introducing such standards, as to have done so would have been highly disproportionate in relation to the scope and impact of those standards, taking into account that this Regulation would only affect competent authorities and entities and would not affect market participants,

We're continuously improving our platform to serve you better.

Your feedback matters! Let us know how we can improve.

Found a bug?

Springflod is a Swedish boutique consultancy firm specialising in cyber security within the financial services sector.

We offer professional services concerning information security governance, risk and compliance.

Crafted with ❤️ by Springflod