Source: OJ L 150, 9.6.2023, pp. 40–205Current language: EN
- Markets in crypto-assets
Basic legislative acts
- MiCA regulation
Article 102 Precautionary measures
Summary What does Article 102 of the MiCA regulation say?
This article sets out the escalation procedure that applies when a host Member State's competent authority suspects irregularities by a crypto-asset market participant operating within its territory.
It establishes a clear chain of notification and intervention, starting with the host authority alerting the home authority and ESMA (and EBA where asset-referenced tokens or e-money tokens are involved), then allowing the host authority to take its own protective measures if the home authority's response proves insufficient.
It also provides a dispute resolution pathway where disagreements between home and host authorities can be referred to ESMA or EBA, depending on the type of crypto-asset involved.
This article connects directly to the broader cross-border supervisory cooperation framework in the regulation, acting as the practical enforcement mechanism for situations where the home-country supervision model breaks down.
Important points:
- Host Member State competent authorities are required to notify the home Member State competent authority and ESMA when they have clear and demonstrable grounds for suspecting irregularities, with EBA also notified where asset-referenced tokens or e-money tokens are concerned.
- Where the home authority's measures fail to resolve a persisting infringement, the host authority may take its own measures to protect clients and crypto-asset holders, including preventing the entity from conducting further activities in the host Member State.
- Disputes between home and host competent authorities over measures taken can be referred to ESMA (for most crypto-assets) or EBA (for asset-referenced tokens and e-money tokens), with Article 19(4) of the respective ESA regulations applying.
Springlex's summary of the article, a reading aid, not a substitute for the legal text.
Where the competent authority of a host Member State has clear and demonstrable grounds for suspecting that there are irregularities in the activities of an offeror or person seeking admission to trading of crypto-assets, an issuer of an asset-referenced token or e-money token, or a crypto-asset service provider, it shall notify the competent authority of the home Member State and ESMA thereof.
Where the irregularities referred to in the first subparagraph concern an issuer of an asset-referenced token or e-money token, or a crypto-asset service related to asset-referenced tokens or e-money tokens, the competent authority of the host Member State shall also notify EBA.
Where, despite the measures taken by the competent authority of the home Member State, the irregularities referred to in paragraph 1 persist, amounting to an infringement of this Regulation, the competent authority of the host Member State, after informing the competent authority of the home Member State, ESMA and, where appropriate, EBA, shall take appropriate measures in order to protect clients of crypto-asset service providers and holders of crypto-assets, in particular retail holders. Such measures include preventing the offeror, person seeking admission to trading, the issuer of the asset-referenced token or e-money token or the crypto-asset service provider from conducting further activities in the host Member State. The competent authority shall inform ESMA and, where appropriate, EBA thereof without undue delay. ESMA, and, where involved, EBA, shall inform the Commission accordingly without undue delay.
Where a competent authority of the home Member State disagrees with any of the measures taken by a competent authority of the host Member State pursuant to paragraph 2 of this Article, it may bring the matter to the attention of ESMA. Article 19(4) of Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010 shall apply in such situations mutatis mutandis.
By way of derogation from the first subparagraph of this paragraph, where the measures referred to in paragraph 2 of this Article concern an issuer of an asset-referenced token or e-money token, or a crypto-asset service related to asset-referenced tokens or e-money tokens, the competent authority of the host Member State may bring the matter to the attention of EBA. Article 19(4) of Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010 shall apply in such situations mutatis mutandis.
Springlex and this text is meant purely as a documentation tool and has no legal effect. No liability is assumed for its content. The authentic version of this act is the one published in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Definition
placing of crypto-assets
Definition
official currency
Definition
electronic money institution
Definition
distributed ledger
Definition
reception and transmission of orders for crypto-assets on behalf of clients
Definition
exchange of crypto-assets for funds
Definition
credit institution
Definition
consensus mechanism
Definition
operation of a trading platform for crypto-assets
Definition
e-money token
Definition
home Member State
- where the offeror or person seeking admission to trading of crypto-assets other than asset-referenced tokens or e-money tokens has its registered office in the Union, the Member State where that offeror or person has its registered office;
- where the offeror or person seeking admission to trading of crypto-assets other than asset-referenced tokens or e-money tokens has no registered office in the Union but does have one or more branches in the Union, the Member State chosen by that offeror or person from among the Member States where it has branches;
- where the offeror or person seeking admission to trading of crypto-assets other than asset-referenced tokens or e-money tokens is established in a third country and has no branch in the Union, either the Member State where the crypto-assets are intended to be offered to the public for the first time or, at the choice of the offeror or person seeking admission to trading, the Member State where the first application for admission to trading of those crypto-assets is made;
- in the case of an issuer of asset-referenced tokens, the Member State where the issuer of asset-referenced tokens has its registered office;
- in the case of an issuer of e-money tokens, the Member State where the issuer of e-money tokens is authorised as a credit institution under Directive 2013/36/EU or as an electronic money institution under Directive 2009/110/EC;
- in the case of crypto-asset service providers, the Member State where the crypto-asset service provider has its registered office;
Definition
crypto-asset service
- providing custody and administration of crypto-assets on behalf of clients;
- operation of a trading platform for crypto-assets;
- exchange of crypto-assets for funds;
- exchange of crypto-assets for other crypto-assets;
- execution of orders for crypto-assets on behalf of clients;
- placing of crypto-assets;
- reception and transmission of orders for crypto-assets on behalf of clients;
- providing advice on crypto-assets;
- providing portfolio management on crypto-assets;
- providing transfer services for crypto-assets on behalf of clients;
Definition
offer to the public
Definition
providing advice on crypto-assets
Definition
offeror
Definition
execution of orders for crypto-assets on behalf of clients
Definition
electronic money
Definition
retail holder
Definition
crypto-asset service provider
Definition
crypto-asset
Definition
DLT network node
Definition
funds
Definition
client
Definition
asset-referenced token
Definition
issuer
Definition
exchange of crypto-assets for other crypto-assets
Definition
electronic money token
Definition
providing custody and administration of crypto-assets on behalf of clients
Definition
providing transfer services for crypto-assets on behalf of clients
Definition
distributed ledger technology
Definition
host Member State
Definition
competent authority
- designated by each Member State in accordance with Article 93 concerning offerors, persons seeking admission to trading of crypto-assets other than asset-referenced tokens and e-money tokens, issuers of asset-referenced tokens, or crypto-asset service providers;
- designated by each Member State for the application of Directive 2009/110/EC concerning issuers of e-money tokens;