Source: OJ L 150, 9.6.2023, pp. 40–205

Current language: EN

Article 52 Liability of issuers of e-money tokens for the information given in a crypto-asset white paper


Summary What does Article 52 of the MiCA regulation say?

This article establishes the civil liability regime for issuers of e-money tokens in connection with the content of their crypto-asset white papers.

It directly mirrors the liability framework that Article 26 sets out for issuers of asset-referenced tokens, applying the same logic to the e-money token context.

The core principle is that where an issuer has breached Article 51 by including incomplete, unfair, unclear, or misleading information in a white paper, both the issuer and the members of its governing bodies are liable to token holders for any resulting losses.

Importantly, any contractual attempt to exclude or limit this liability is rendered void, and the article sits alongside rather than displacing any additional civil liability that may exist under national law.

Important points:

  • As an issuer of e-money tokens, you cannot contractually exclude or limit your civil liability for misleading or incomplete white paper disclosures — any such clause has no legal effect.
  • The burden of proof lies with the token holder, who must demonstrate both that the white paper contained deficient information and that reliance on that information influenced their decision to purchase, sell, or exchange the token.
  • Liability for the white paper summary specifically is limited: issuers are only exposed where the summary is misleading, inaccurate, or inconsistent when read alongside the full white paper, or where it fails to provide key information needed by prospective holders.

Springlex's summary of the article, a reading aid, not a substitute for the legal text.

    1. Where an issuer of an e-money token has infringed Article 51, by providing in its crypto-asset white paper or in a modified crypto-asset white paper, information that is not complete, fair or clear, or that is misleading, that issuer and the members of its administrative, management or supervisory body shall be liable to a holder of such e-money token for any loss incurred due to that infringement.

    1. Any contractual exclusion or limitation of civil liability as referred to in paragraph 1 shall be deprived of legal effect.

    1. It shall be the responsibility of the holder of the e-money token to present evidence indicating that the issuer of that e-money token has infringed Article 51 by providing in its crypto-asset white paper or in a modified crypto-asset white paper information that is not complete, fair or clear, or that is misleading and that reliance on such information had an impact on the holder’s decision to purchase, sell or exchange that e-money token.

    1. The issuer and the members of its administrative, management or supervisory bodies shall not be liable for loss suffered as a result of reliance on the information provided in a summary pursuant to Article 51(6), including any translation thereof, except where the summary:

      1. is misleading, inaccurate or inconsistent when read together with the other parts of the crypto-asset white paper; or

      2. does not provide, when read together with the other parts of the crypto-asset white paper, key information in order to aid prospective holders when considering whether to purchase such e-money tokens.

    1. This Article is without prejudice to any other civil liability pursuant to national law.

We're continuously improving our platform to serve you better.

Your feedback matters! Let us know how we can improve.

Found a bug?

Springflod is a Swedish boutique consultancy firm specialising in cyber security within the financial services sector.

We offer professional services concerning information security governance, risk and compliance.

Crafted with ❤️ by Springflod