Source: OJ L 150, 9.6.2023, pp. 40–205

Current language: EN

Article 89 Prohibition of insider dealing


Summary What does Article 89 of the MiCA regulation say?

This article defines and prohibits insider dealing in crypto-asset markets.

It establishes what constitutes insider dealing — using non-public information to trade, cancel, amend, or bid on crypto-assets — and extends the prohibition to recommending or inducing others to do the same.

The article draws a deliberately wide net, covering not just direct trading on inside information but also indirect actions and situations where a person knows or ought to know they are acting on inside information.

It connects directly to Article 87, which defines inside information itself, and sits within the broader market integrity framework of Title VI.

Notably, the article also extends liability to natural persons within legal entities who participate in the relevant decisions.

Important points:

  • Do not engage in, attempt, recommend, or induce insider dealing in crypto-assets, whether acting for your own account or a third party's.
  • The prohibition applies broadly to any person in possession of inside information, including corporate insiders, capital holders, employees, DLT participants, and those involved in criminal activities, as well as anyone who knows or ought to know they hold inside information.
  • Where a legal person is involved, the prohibition applies under national law to the natural persons who participated in the decision to carry out the relevant trade or order action.

Springlex's summary of the article, a reading aid, not a substitute for the legal text.

    1. For the purposes of this Regulation, insider dealing shall be deemed to arise where a person possesses inside information and uses that information by acquiring or disposing of, for its own account or for the account of a third party, directly or indirectly, crypto-assets to which that information relates. The use of inside information by cancelling or amending an order concerning a crypto-asset to which the information relates where the order was placed before the person concerned possessed the inside information, shall also be considered to be insider dealing. The use of inside information shall also comprise submitting, modifying or withdrawing a bid by a person for its own account or for the account of a third party.

    1. No person shall engage or attempt to engage in insider dealing or use inside information about crypto-assets to acquire, or dispose of, those crypto-assets, directly or indirectly, whether for that person’s own account or for the account of a third party. No person shall recommend that another person engage in insider dealing or induce another person to engage in insider dealing.

    1. No person in the possession of inside information about crypto-assets shall, based on that inside information, recommend or induce another person:

      1. to acquire or dispose of those crypto-assets; or

      2. to cancel or amend an order concerning those crypto-assets.

    1. The use of a recommendation or inducement as referred to in paragraph 3 amounts to insider dealing within the meaning of this Article where the person using that recommendation or inducement knows or ought to know that it is based on inside information.

    1. This Article applies to any person who possesses inside information as a result of:

      1. being a member of the administrative, management or supervisory bodies of the issuer, the offeror, or the person seeking admission to trading;

      2. having a holding in the capital of the issuer, the offeror, or the person seeking admission to trading;

      3. having access to the information through the exercise of an employment, profession or duties or in relation to its role in the distributed ledger technology or similar technology; or

      4. being involved in criminal activities.

    2. This Article also applies to any person who possesses inside information under circumstances other than those referred to in the first subparagraph where that person knows or ought to know that it is inside information.

    1. Where person as referred to in paragraph 1 is a legal person, this Article shall apply, in accordance with national law, to the natural persons who participate in the decision to carry out the acquisition, disposal, cancellation or amendment of an order for the account of the legal person concerned.

We're continuously improving our platform to serve you better.

Your feedback matters! Let us know how we can improve.

Found a bug?

Springflod is a Swedish boutique consultancy firm specialising in cyber security within the financial services sector.

We offer professional services concerning information security governance, risk and compliance.

Crafted with ❤️ by Springflod