Source: OJ L, 2025/294, 13.2.2025Current language: EN
- Markets in crypto-assets
Crypto-asset service provider
- RTS on CASP complaints handling
Article 8 Procedures to ensure consistent complaints-handling
Summary What does Article 8 of the RTS on CASP complaints handling say?
Article 8 sets out a data monitoring obligation for crypto-asset service providers, requiring them to continuously analyse data generated through their complaints-handling process.
Rather than treating complaints as isolated events, this article establishes an ongoing review function, ensuring that providers track performance and patterns across the entire complaints lifecycle.
This article connects directly to the broader complaints-handling framework established in earlier articles, effectively closing the loop by requiring providers to measure how well that framework is operating in practice.
Important points:
- Continuously analyse your complaints-handling data — this is an ongoing obligation, not a periodic one.
- The data to be tracked spans four areas: average processing times at each stage, the number of complaints received and instances of non-compliance with your own time limits, complaint topic categories, and investigation outcomes.
- This analysis feeds into the reporting obligation to the management body referenced in Article 2, making it a key accountability mechanism within the overall complaints framework.
Springlex's summary of the article, a reading aid, not a substitute for the legal text.
Crypto-asset service providers shall analyse on a continuous basis complaints-handling data. Such data shall include all of the following:
the average processing time, for the relevant period under consideration, for each step of the complaints handling procedure, including acknowledgement, investigation, response time;
the number of complaints received, for the relevant period under consideration, and for each step of the complaints handling procedure, the number of complaints where the crypto asset service provider did not comply with the maximum time limits set out in its complaints handling procedure;
the categories of the topics to which complaints relate;
outcomes of investigations.
Springlex and this text is meant purely as a documentation tool and has no legal effect. No liability is assumed for its content. The authentic version of this act is the one published in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Definition
placing of crypto-assets
Definition
distributed ledger
Definition
reception and transmission of orders for crypto-assets on behalf of clients
Definition
exchange of crypto-assets for funds
Definition
consensus mechanism
Definition
operation of a trading platform for crypto-assets
Definition
crypto-asset service
- providing custody and administration of crypto-assets on behalf of clients;
- operation of a trading platform for crypto-assets;
- exchange of crypto-assets for funds;
- exchange of crypto-assets for other crypto-assets;
- execution of orders for crypto-assets on behalf of clients;
- placing of crypto-assets;
- reception and transmission of orders for crypto-assets on behalf of clients;
- providing advice on crypto-assets;
- providing portfolio management on crypto-assets;
- providing transfer services for crypto-assets on behalf of clients;
Definition
offer to the public
Definition
providing advice on crypto-assets
Definition
offeror
Definition
execution of orders for crypto-assets on behalf of clients
Definition
crypto-asset service provider
Definition
crypto-asset
Definition
DLT network node
Definition
funds
Definition
client
Definition
issuer
Definition
exchange of crypto-assets for other crypto-assets
Definition
providing custody and administration of crypto-assets on behalf of clients
Definition
providing transfer services for crypto-assets on behalf of clients
Definition
distributed ledger technology