Source: OJ L, 2025/293, 13.2.2025Current language: EN
- Markets in crypto-assets
ART/EMT issuer
- RTS on issuer complaints handling
Article 1 Handling of complaints and complaints management policy and function
Summary What does Article 1 of the RTS on issuer complaints handling say?
This foundational article sets the scene for the entire regulation by establishing two things: what constitutes a complaint, and what structural components issuers of asset-referenced tokens must have in place to handle them.
On the first point, a complaint is broadly defined to cover any statement of dissatisfaction related to the issuance, offer, or admission to trading of asset-referenced tokens, and can be submitted by a wide range of parties, including consumer associations.
On the second point, issuers are required to put in place both a complaints management policy and a complaints management function, with senior management firmly in the driving seat for ownership and compliance.
Important points:
- Establish and maintain a complaints-handling procedure covering both a formal policy and a dedicated management function.
- Senior management of the issuer is responsible for defining, endorsing, implementing, and monitoring the complaints management policy.
- The obligation extends beyond issuers to third-party entities involved in distributing asset-referenced tokens.
Springlex's summary of the article, a reading aid, not a substitute for the legal text.
Issuers of asset-referenced tokens and, where applicable, third-party entities shall establish and maintain procedures for handling of complaints, where a complaint is:
a statement of dissatisfaction addressed to them by a natural or legal person or any other interested party, including consumer associations that represent holders of asset-referenced tokens, relating to the issuance, the offer or seeking admission to trading of asset-referenced tokens under Regulation (EU) 2023/1114;
submitted by a ‘complainant’, which is a natural or legal person or any other interested party, including consumer associations that represent holders of asset-referenced tokens and where that person, or any other interested party, purports to be eligible to submit a complaint to an issuer of asset-referenced tokens or a third-party entity that have been distributing, totally or partially, asset-referenced tokens.
Issuers of asset-referenced tokens shall establish and maintain complaints-handling procedures that include all of the following:
a ‘complaints management policy’, which shall be:
defined and endorsed by the issuer of asset-referenced tokens’ senior management, that shall also be responsible for the implementation of that policy and for monitoring compliance with it;
set out in a written document available in electronic or paper format;
made available to all relevant staff of the issuer of asset-referenced tokens through an adequate internal channel.
a ‘complaints management function’, which shall:
enable complaints to be investigated fairly;
identify and mitigate possible conflicts of interest.
Springlex and this text is meant purely as a documentation tool and has no legal effect. No liability is assumed for its content. The authentic version of this act is the one published in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Definition
official currency
Definition
distributed ledger
Definition
consensus mechanism
Definition
crypto-asset
Definition
DLT network node
Definition
asset-referenced token
Definition
issuer
Definition
electronic money token
Definition
distributed ledger technology