Source: OJ L, 2025/885, 20.8.2025Current language: EN
- Markets in crypto-assets
Crypto-asset service provider
- RTS on market abuse
Article 8 Coordination procedures for the detection and sanctioning of cross-border market abuse situations
Summary What does Article 8 of the RTS on market abuse say?
This article shifts focus from the obligations of private market participants — covered extensively in earlier articles — to the cooperation obligations of competent authorities themselves when dealing with cross-border market abuse in crypto-assets.
It establishes a framework for how national competent authorities must communicate and coordinate with one another when a market abuse situation spans more than one jurisdiction, from the earliest stage of suspicion through to formal investigation and enforcement.
ESMA is also referenced as an optional coordination body that authorities may call upon.
Important points:
- Competent authorities are required to notify other relevant competent authorities without undue delay when they suspect cross-border market abuse, and to share information about any related supervisory or criminal investigations.
- Competent authorities are required to periodically update each other, share significant interim developments, and coordinate their supervisory and enforcement actions throughout a cross-border market abuse situation.
- Competent authorities involved in a cross-border investigation or enforcement activity may request ESMA's coordination to support the process.
Springlex's summary of the article, a reading aid, not a substitute for the legal text.
A competent authority that suspects that cross-border market abuse has taken place, may have taken place, or may be taking place, shall report the status of its preliminary assessment to the other competent authorities concerned without undue delay, including, where applicable, to the competent authorities of the trading platforms where the crypto-asset is admitted to trading.
When informed about cross-border market abuse situations, the receiving competent authorities shall, without undue delay, share information about the planning or existence of any supervisory activity or measure or, where applicable and where such information is available to the receiving competent authority, about an existing criminal investigation on the same case.
Competent authorities concerned shall:
periodically update each other about cross-border market abuse situations;
inform each other about significant interim developments related to cross-border market abuse situations;
coordinate their supervisory and enforcement actions.
A competent authority that has formally initiated an investigation, enforcement activity or, where applicable, that is aware of a criminal investigation, shall inform the other competent authorities concerned thereof, including, where applicable, the competent authorities of the trading platforms where the crypto-asset is admitted to trading. The reporting competent authority may inform ESMA.
Competent authorities having initiated or involved in an investigation or enforcement activity in the context of cross-border situations may request the coordination of ESMA.
For the purposes of this Article, ‘cross-border market abuse situations’ shall mean any of the following situations:
a situation in which more than one competent authority is competent to detect, investigate or sanction a potential market abuse case;
a situation in which cooperation between two or more competent authorities is necessary to detect, investigate or sanction a potential market abuse case.
Relevant recitals
Recital 16 Cross-border coordination between competent authorities
Considering that markets in crypto-assets are inherently cross-border, it is necessary to specify coordination procedures between the competent authorities for the detection and sanctioning of market abuse in case of cross-border market abuse situations. Such coordination procedures should ensure that there are no conflicting investigations or enforcement activities. In that context, cross-border market abuse situations should include cases in which suspicious transactions are carried out in a Member State concerning a crypto-asset that is admitted to trading in another Member State and cases in which the crypto-asset service provider concerned is operating in more than one Member State.
Springlex and this text is meant purely as a documentation tool and has no legal effect. No liability is assumed for its content. The authentic version of this act is the one published in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Definition
placing of crypto-assets
Definition
official currency
Definition
distributed ledger
Definition
reception and transmission of orders for crypto-assets on behalf of clients
Definition
exchange of crypto-assets for funds
Definition
consensus mechanism
Definition
operation of a trading platform for crypto-assets
Definition
e-money token
Definition
crypto-asset service
- providing custody and administration of crypto-assets on behalf of clients;
- operation of a trading platform for crypto-assets;
- exchange of crypto-assets for funds;
- exchange of crypto-assets for other crypto-assets;
- execution of orders for crypto-assets on behalf of clients;
- placing of crypto-assets;
- reception and transmission of orders for crypto-assets on behalf of clients;
- providing advice on crypto-assets;
- providing portfolio management on crypto-assets;
- providing transfer services for crypto-assets on behalf of clients;
Definition
offer to the public
Definition
providing advice on crypto-assets
Definition
offeror
Definition
execution of orders for crypto-assets on behalf of clients
Definition
crypto-asset service provider
Definition
crypto-asset
Definition
DLT network node
Definition
funds
Definition
client
Definition
asset-referenced token
Definition
issuer
Definition
exchange of crypto-assets for other crypto-assets
Definition
electronic money token
Definition
providing custody and administration of crypto-assets on behalf of clients
Definition
providing transfer services for crypto-assets on behalf of clients
Definition
distributed ledger technology
Definition
competent authority
- designated by each Member State in accordance with Article 93 concerning offerors, persons seeking admission to trading of crypto-assets other than asset-referenced tokens and e-money tokens, issuers of asset-referenced tokens, or crypto-asset service providers;
- designated by each Member State for the application of Directive 2009/110/EC concerning issuers of e-money tokens;