Source: OJ L, 2025/418, 24.3.2025Current language: EN
Preamble Recitals
Recital 1Scope of remuneration governance requirements
Requirements set out in Articles 45(1) of Regulation (EU) 2023/1114 also apply to electronic money institutions issuing significant e-money tokens, in accordance with Article 58(1), point (a), of that Regulation, where required by the competent authority under Article 35(4) of that Regulation, to issuers of asset-reference tokens that are not significant, and, where required by the competent authority under Article 58(2) of that Regulation, to electronic money institutions issuing non-significant e-money tokens.
Recital 2Interaction with sectoral remuneration frameworks
Credit institutions, investment firms, undertakings for collective investment in transferable securities (UCITS management companies) and alternative investment fonds managers (AIFM) that are issuers of significant ARTs are to comply with the relevant more specific or stricter requirements set for those issuers in Directives 2013/36/EU(2), (EU) 2019/2034(3), 2009/65/EC(4) and 2011/61/EU(5) of the European Parliament and of the Council, in addition to the requirements under Regulation (EU) 2023/1114 and this Regulation on governance arrangements for remuneration policies. To achieve the objective of sound and effective risk management of issuers of significant asset-referenced or e-money tokens, remuneration policies should provide incentives for staff for long-term oriented risk-taking behaviour in line with the risk appetite of issuers of significant asset-referenced or e-money tokens and contribute to the protection of the holders of asset-referenced or e-money tokens.
Recital 3Investment firm–based remuneration framework adaptation
Considering the similarities of the business model of issuers of significant asset-referenced or e-money tokens with the business model of investment firms that issue financial instruments, and in order to ensure a level playing field across the Union, it is necessary to set out a framework for governance arrangements on remuneration policies that includes the same elements as the rules on remuneration policy applicable to investment firms. However, this framework should be tailored to issuers of significant asset-referenced and e-money tokens, whose business is different from the activity of issuing financial instruments by investment firms or the performance of related investment services. This framework should aim at ensuring the same objectives as the remuneration framework for investment firms under Directive (EU) 2019/2034.
Recital 4Core principles for sound remuneration governance
To ensure that remuneration policies promote sound and effective risk management of the issuers of significant asset-referenced tokens or of the electronic money institutions issuing significant e-money tokens, do not provide incentives for excessive risk taking and are aligned with the long-term interests of those issuers across the European Union, it is necessary to specify the main aspects of the remuneration policies to be applied by such issuers by taking into consideration and adapting the ones already existing under other sectoral legislations for entities acting on the financial market.
Recital 5Safeguards for control functions and client treatment
To ensure that the remuneration framework provides no incentives to lower risk standards, specific requirements for the variable remuneration of staff in control functions should be set to ensure that they are remunerated mainly based on control objectives while the remuneration policies for all staff, including marketing or sales staff should provide no incentives for a preferential treatment of clients or counterparts.
Recital 6Risk-aligned variable remuneration mechanisms
In addition to the determination of an appropriate maximum ratio between variable and fixed remuneration, it is appropriate for issuers of significant asset-referenced tokens or electronic money tokens, to impose additional requirements to align the variable remuneration of staff that has a material impact on the risk profile of the issuers of asset-referenced tokens or e-money tokens within the scope if this regulation or on the risk profile of the tokens they issue, so as to ensure that the variable remuneration is linked to the risk adjusted performance of the issuer, including by requiring the application of deferral arrangements, malus and claw back.
Recital 7Use of instruments for variable remuneration
To ensure a proper risk alignment of the variable remuneration awarded in instruments, the instruments awarded should consist of shares, share-linked or equivalent instruments or the significant tokens issued.
Recital 8Integration of ESG risks into remuneration policies
Environmental, social and governance (ESG) factors, including the adverse impact on the climate stemming from energy use and carbon footprint associated with the underlying information technology infrastructures and consensus mechanisms algorithms, used for the validation of transactions in blockchain systems, are relevant for issuers of asset-referenced or e-money tokens within the scope of this Regulation. ESG factors can affect the risk profile of such issuers, its business model and the acceptance of their tokens. While climate and environmental factors are particularly relevant to the activities and services of such issuers, other types of ESG factors such as tax transparency, human rights, employment conditions and adequate management of risks related to money laundering and other financial crimes are also relevant factors. It is therefore necessary that issuers of asset-referenced tokens or e-money tokens within the scope of this Regulation ensure that their remuneration policies are consistent with ESG risk-related objectives and take into account ESG risks and their possible adverse impacts. In particular, the variable remuneration should be aligned to the ESG risk factors relevant for climate and other environmental impacts caused by the consensus and validation mechanisms used.
Recital 9Development of standards by the EBA
This Regulation is based on the draft regulatory technical standards developed by the European Supervisory Authority (European Banking Authority, EBA) in consultation with the European Securities Markets Authority and submitted by the EBA to the Commission.
Recital 10Public consultation and stakeholder input
EBA has conducted open public consultations on the draft regulatory technical standards on which this Regulation is based, analysed the potential related costs and benefits and requested the opinion of the Banking Stakeholder Group established in accordance with Article 37 of Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council(6),
Springlex and this text is meant purely as a documentation tool and has no legal effect. No liability is assumed for its content. The authentic version of this act is the one published in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Definition
placing of crypto-assets
Definition
official currency
Definition
electronic money institution
Definition
distributed ledger
Definition
reception and transmission of orders for crypto-assets on behalf of clients
Definition
Business unit
Definition
exchange of crypto-assets for funds
Definition
investment firm
Definition
credit institution
Definition
consensus mechanism
Definition
operation of a trading platform for crypto-assets
Definition
UCITS management company
Definition
e-money token
Definition
Remuneration
- monetary or non-monetary payments and benefits, awarded directly to staff by or on behalf of issuers of asset-referenced tokens or e-money tokens in exchange for professional services provided by staff;
- carried interest payments within the meaning of Article 4(1), point (d), of Directive 2011/61/EU;
- other payments made via methods and vehicles which, if they were not considered as remuneration, would lead to a circumvention of the remuneration requirements set out in Regulation (EU) 2023/1114 and in this Regulation.
Definition
crypto-asset service
- providing custody and administration of crypto-assets on behalf of clients;
- operation of a trading platform for crypto-assets;
- exchange of crypto-assets for funds;
- exchange of crypto-assets for other crypto-assets;
- execution of orders for crypto-assets on behalf of clients;
- placing of crypto-assets;
- reception and transmission of orders for crypto-assets on behalf of clients;
- providing advice on crypto-assets;
- providing portfolio management on crypto-assets;
- providing transfer services for crypto-assets on behalf of clients;
Definition
offer to the public
Definition
providing advice on crypto-assets
Definition
offeror
Definition
execution of orders for crypto-assets on behalf of clients
Definition
electronic money
Definition
management body
Definition
crypto-asset service provider
Definition
crypto-asset
Definition
DLT network node
Definition
funds
Definition
client
Definition
asset-referenced token
Definition
issuer
Definition
exchange of crypto-assets for other crypto-assets
Definition
electronic money token
Definition
Risk appetite
Definition
providing custody and administration of crypto-assets on behalf of clients
Definition
providing transfer services for crypto-assets on behalf of clients
Definition
Staff
Definition
distributed ledger technology
Definition
financial instrument
Definition
Control function
Definition
competent authority
- designated by each Member State in accordance with Article 93 concerning offerors, persons seeking admission to trading of crypto-assets other than asset-referenced tokens and e-money tokens, issuers of asset-referenced tokens, or crypto-asset service providers;
- designated by each Member State for the application of Directive 2009/110/EC concerning issuers of e-money tokens;
Footnote 3
Footnote 5
Footnote 4
Footnote 6
Footnote 2