Source: OJ L 333, 27.12.2022, p. 80–152

Current language: EN

Article 34 General conditions for imposing administrative fines on essential and important entities


Summary What does Article 34 of the NIS 2 directive say?

This article sets out the administrative fines regime for both essential and important entities that breach their obligations under the Directive.

It directly builds on Articles 32 and 33, which govern supervisory and enforcement powers, by establishing that fines are an additional tool on top of those existing measures.

The article draws a clear distinction between the two categories of entity, setting higher fine thresholds for essential entities than for important ones.

It also includes flexibility for Member States whose legal systems do not natively provide for administrative fines, allowing courts or tribunals to impose them instead, and leaves it to each Member State to determine whether and how fines apply to public administration entities.

Important points:

  • Essential entities face fines of up to at least EUR 10,000,000 or at least 2% of total worldwide annual turnover, whichever is higher, for breaching the cybersecurity risk-management or incident reporting obligations.
  • Important entities face a lower threshold of up to at least EUR 7,000,000 or at least 1.4% of total worldwide annual turnover, whichever is higher, for the same categories of breach.
  • Administrative fines are imposed in addition to, not instead of, the other enforcement measures available under Articles 32 and 33.

Springlex's summary of the article, a reading aid, not a substitute for the legal text.

    1. Member States shall ensure that the administrative fines imposed on essential and important entities pursuant to this Article in respect of infringements of this Directive are effective, proportionate and dissuasive, taking into account the circumstances of each individual case.

    1. Administrative fines shall be imposed in addition to any of the measures referred to in Article 32(4), points (a) to (h), Article 32(5) and Article 33(4), points (a) to (g).

    1. When deciding whether to impose an administrative fine and deciding on its amount in each individual case, due regard shall be given, as a minimum, to the elements provided for in Article 32(7).

    1. Member States shall ensure that where they infringe Article 21 or 23, essential entities are subject, in accordance with paragraphs 2 and 3 of this Article, to administrative fines of a maximum of at least EUR 10 000 000 or of a maximum of at least 2 % of the total worldwide annual turnover in the preceding financial year of the undertaking to which the essential entity belongs, whichever is higher.

    1. Member States shall ensure that where they infringe Article 21 or 23, important entities are subject, in accordance with paragraphs 2 and 3 of this Article, to administrative fines of a maximum of at least EUR 7 000 000 or of a maximum of at least 1,4 % of the total worldwide annual turnover in the preceding financial year of the undertaking to which the important entity belongs, whichever is higher.

    1. Member States may provide for the power to impose periodic penalty payments in order to compel an essential or important entity to cease an infringement of this Directive in accordance with a prior decision of the competent authority.

    1. Without prejudice to the powers of the competent authorities pursuant to Articles 32 and 33, each Member State may lay down the rules on whether and to what extent administrative fines may be imposed on public administration entities.

    1. Where the legal system of a Member State does not provide for administrative fines, that Member State shall ensure that this Article is applied in such a manner that the fine is initiated by the competent authority and imposed by competent national courts or tribunals, while ensuring that those legal remedies are effective and have an equivalent effect to the administrative fines imposed by the competent authorities. In any event, the fines imposed shall be effective, proportionate and dissuasive. The Member State shall notify to the Commission the provisions of the laws which it adopts pursuant to this paragraph by 17 October 2024 and, without delay, any subsequent amendment law or amendment affecting them.

We're continuously improving our platform to serve you better.

Your feedback matters! Let us know how we can improve.

Found a bug?

Springflod is a Swedish boutique consultancy firm specialising in cyber security within the financial services sector.

We offer professional services concerning information security governance, risk and compliance.

Crafted with ❤️ by Springflod