Source: OJ L, 2025/296, 13.2.2025

Current language: EN

RTS on crypto-asset white paper approval

COMMISSION DELEGATED REGULATION (EU) 2025/296

of 31 October 2024

supplementing Regulation (EU) 2023/1114 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to regulatory technical standards specifying the procedure for the approval of a crypto-asset white paper

(Text with EEA relevance)

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) 2023/1114 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 May 2023 on markets in crypto-assets, and amending Regulations (EU) No 1093/2010 and (EU) No 1095/2010 and Directives 2013/36/EU and (EU) 2019/1937(1)OJ L 150, 9.6.2023, p. 40, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2023/1114/oj., and in particular to Article 17(8), third subparagraph thereof,

Whereas:

Open full page
Recital 1

The procedure for the approval of a crypto-assetmeans a digital representation of a value or of a right that is able to be transferred and stored electronically using distributed ledger technology or similar technology; white paper pursuant to Article 17(1), point (a), of Regulation (EU) 2023/1114 is closely linked to the procedure applicable for the notification of relevant information to the competent authoritymeans one or more authorities:designated by each Member State in accordance with Article 93 concerning offerors, persons seeking admission to trading of crypto-assets other than asset-referenced tokens and e-money tokens, issuers of asset-referenced tokens, or crypto-asset service providers;designated by each Member State for the application of Directive 2009/110/EC concerning issuers of e-money tokens; pursuant to Article 17(1), point (b), of that Regulation because the competent authoritymeans one or more authorities:designated by each Member State in accordance with Article 93 concerning offerors, persons seeking admission to trading of crypto-assets other than asset-referenced tokens and e-money tokens, issuers of asset-referenced tokens, or crypto-asset service providers;designated by each Member State for the application of Directive 2009/110/EC concerning issuers of e-money tokens; cannot approve the crypto-assetmeans a digital representation of a value or of a right that is able to be transferred and stored electronically using distributed ledger technology or similar technology; white paper in the case of a negative opinion from the European Central Bank (ECB) or, where applicable, the relevant central bank pursuant to Article 17(5), third subparagraph, of that Regulation. At the same time, according to Article 17(5) of that Regulation the information submitted to the ECB and, where applicable, the relevant central bank, based on which they are to issue an opinion, is required to be complete and to include the crypto-assetmeans a digital representation of a value or of a right that is able to be transferred and stored electronically using distributed ledger technology or similar technology; white paper submitted by the issuermeans a natural or legal person, or other undertaking, who issues crypto-assets; to the competent authoritymeans one or more authorities:designated by each Member State in accordance with Article 93 concerning offerors, persons seeking admission to trading of crypto-assets other than asset-referenced tokens and e-money tokens, issuers of asset-referenced tokens, or crypto-asset service providers;designated by each Member State for the application of Directive 2009/110/EC concerning issuers of e-money tokens; in accordance with Article 17(1), point (a), of that Regulation. Therefore, the provisions further specifying the procedure for the approval of a crypto-assetmeans a digital representation of a value or of a right that is able to be transferred and stored electronically using distributed ledger technology or similar technology; white paper referred to in Article 17(1), point (a), of Regulation (EU) 2023/1114 should establish a similar process to the one set out in Article 17(3) of that Regulation. In particular, those provisions should provide for a completeness assessment with the same rules and timelines as those set out in Article 17(3) of Regulation (EU) 2023/1114.

Recital 2

In order to ensure the swift and efficient completion of the crypto-assetmeans a digital representation of a value or of a right that is able to be transferred and stored electronically using distributed ledger technology or similar technology; white paper approval process in the most proportionate way, the submission of the application for approval of the crypto-assetmeans a digital representation of a value or of a right that is able to be transferred and stored electronically using distributed ledger technology or similar technology; white paper and other communication or exchange of information between the credit institutionmeans a credit institution as defined in Article 4(1), point (1), of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 and authorised under Directive 2013/36/EU; and the competent authoritymeans one or more authorities:designated by each Member State in accordance with Article 93 concerning offerors, persons seeking admission to trading of crypto-assets other than asset-referenced tokens and e-money tokens, issuers of asset-referenced tokens, or crypto-asset service providers;designated by each Member State for the application of Directive 2009/110/EC concerning issuers of e-money tokens; as well as between the competent authoritymeans one or more authorities:designated by each Member State in accordance with Article 93 concerning offerors, persons seeking admission to trading of crypto-assets other than asset-referenced tokens and e-money tokens, issuers of asset-referenced tokens, or crypto-asset service providers;designated by each Member State for the application of Directive 2009/110/EC concerning issuers of e-money tokens; and the ECB or, as applicable, a relevant central bank, should be made via electronic means, which allow easier and faster communication and record-keeping. Given the high expectations of diligence on both public authorities and institutions, a high level of security should be expected to be achieved.

Recital 3

Where, in the course of the completeness assessment, a competent authoritymeans one or more authorities:designated by each Member State in accordance with Article 93 concerning offerors, persons seeking admission to trading of crypto-assets other than asset-referenced tokens and e-money tokens, issuers of asset-referenced tokens, or crypto-asset service providers;designated by each Member State for the application of Directive 2009/110/EC concerning issuers of e-money tokens; finds that the crypto-assetmeans a digital representation of a value or of a right that is able to be transferred and stored electronically using distributed ledger technology or similar technology; white paper is missing some of the elements required by Article 19(1) of Regulation (EU) 2023/1114, and requests the credit institutionsmeans a credit institution as defined in Article 4(1), point (1), of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 and authorised under Directive 2013/36/EU; to resubmit the crypto-assetmeans a digital representation of a value or of a right that is able to be transferred and stored electronically using distributed ledger technology or similar technology; white paper with those additional elements, the credit institutionmeans a credit institution as defined in Article 4(1), point (1), of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 and authorised under Directive 2013/36/EU; should be able to demonstrate to the competent authoritymeans one or more authorities:designated by each Member State in accordance with Article 93 concerning offerors, persons seeking admission to trading of crypto-assets other than asset-referenced tokens and e-money tokens, issuers of asset-referenced tokens, or crypto-asset service providers;designated by each Member State for the application of Directive 2009/110/EC concerning issuers of e-money tokens; how the additional information in the revised white paper addresses that request. It is therefore necessary to provide that each revised version of the crypto-assetmeans a digital representation of a value or of a right that is able to be transferred and stored electronically using distributed ledger technology or similar technology; white paper submitted to the competent authoritymeans one or more authorities:designated by each Member State in accordance with Article 93 concerning offerors, persons seeking admission to trading of crypto-assets other than asset-referenced tokens and e-money tokens, issuers of asset-referenced tokens, or crypto-asset service providers;designated by each Member State for the application of Directive 2009/110/EC concerning issuers of e-money tokens; contains such an explanation, as well as a marked-up file of the crypto-assetmeans a digital representation of a value or of a right that is able to be transferred and stored electronically using distributed ledger technology or similar technology; white paper that clearly highlights all changes made since the previously submitted version, and a clean file where such changes are not highlighted.

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

  1. Article 1Application for approval of a crypto-asset white paper
  2. Article 2Acknowledgement of the receipt of an application for approval of a crypto-asset white paper
  3. Article 3Assessment of completeness of the crypto-asset white paper
  4. Article 4Request of missing information to a crypto-asset white paper
  5. Article 5Notification of completeness of a crypto-asset white paper
  6. Article 6Information exchange between the competent authority and the ECB and the relevant central banks in relation to the crypto-asset white paper
  7. Article 7Substantive assessment of a crypto-asset white paper
  8. Article 8Request of changes to a crypto-asset white paper
  9. Article 9Approval of the crypto-asset white paper
  10. Article 10Entry into force

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 31 October 2024.

For the Commission

The President

Ursula VON DER LEYEN

We're continuously improving our platform to serve you better.

Your feedback matters! Let us know how we can improve.

Found a bug?

Springflod is a Swedish boutique consultancy firm specialising in cyber security within the financial services sector.

We offer professional services concerning information security governance, risk and compliance.

Crafted with ❤️ by Springflod